Obama and Giannoulias – “Happy Birthday, Mr. President!”

August 6, 2010

Michelle (let them eat cake) Obama goes jet setting to Spain and Barack Barry Obama Soetoro goes to Chicago to get a blow job from one of his old basketball buddies from the East Bank Club. Sounds to good to be true? Keep reading and I think you’ll find yourself agreeing with me. So I see this photo on Drudge and the first thing that strikes me is how gay these guys look – like one them has had the others guys dick in his mouth. So you can see it in their handshake and how close they are. Look in the eyes. It’s not an intimate look but you can see there is lot there that’s not being said. Looks to me like Alexi has been doing the sucking.

So I start to do a little research, investigating, googling – whatever you want to call it and I find out a little more about Alexi Giannoulias because I don’t know squat about the guy. So I’m reading the article at SourceWatch and I come across this little tidbit.

Obama and Giannoulias reportedly met on the basketball court “in the late 1990s … at the East Bank Club, a luxurious spot in downtown Chicago,”

So then I google “East Bank Club gay hangouts” and I find this site called “cruisinggays.com” and they list East Bank Club as number 16 on the gay gyms in the Chicago area. This is how they describe it:

Most guys connect in the steam room, which can be very active and take it to their sleeping room.

So it’s a well known gay hang out and pick up club where you can get a workout and a pick up game and whatever else you want. It’s ritzy place and its not a place your average gay guy can go though so that is why it is only #16 on their list. But apparently it’s not as elite as “Man Country” where apparently both Rahm and Obama were frequent fliers.

But Obama met his little gay Greek buddy at East Bank Club, also know as the ‘Sperm Bank Club’, and helped get him elected to the Illinois State Treasurer office. Now he’s helping to get him elected to the US Senate so he is certainly on the fast track. It pays to know who’s dick to suck in Chicago! Apparently Obama is very receptive to this kind of treatment and he returns handsome political dividends if you can keep your mouth shut – no pun intended.

Giannoulias is quite the little queen and at the ripe age of thirty-something is already involved in numerous corruption scandals which you can read about at SourceWatch, but we are talking about Chicago and we all know that Obama is the only clean politician to come out of Chicago – at least he hasn’t picked up any diseases that we know of – yet.

I learned quite a few things about the gay lifestyle I did not know. For instance now I know what “down low” really means in the gay black community. DLC was really code for the “Down Low Committee” and not Democratic Leadership Council at Trinity. Apparently the gay community knows all about Obama and his betrayal of them. They all know what he was doing at these gay clubs and at Trinity and playing basketball but the media is silent. Somehow the CFR controlled media hasn’t figured any of this out yet? Remarkable isn’t it. It took me all of 1/2 hour on the internet.

Apparently Michelle knows too and maybe thats why she went to Spain. To have some quality time with her own lesbian lover! So “Happy Birthday, Mr. President!”

JFK had Marilyn Monroe but Obama has Alexi.

Here a good link that covers a lot of this info very well.

SPECIAL REPORT: Obama and Emanuel: members of gay bath club in Chicago


Obama – Golf of Mexico

June 21, 2010

Here’s another funny from our dear leader:

White House mocks BP CEO’s yacht race, defends Obama golf:

WASHINGTON — A White House spokesman mocked BP’s chief executive Monday for attending a luxury yacht race despite the oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, but then defended President Barack Obama’s own weekend golf game.

Tony Hayward, the British energy giant’s embattled chief, drew fire from the White House over the weekend for having gone to the yacht race Saturday off the Isle of Wight.

White House spokesman Bill Burton took him to task again on Monday, suggesting that Hayward take part in the cleanup operations in the Gulf of Mexico with the 300,000 euro yacht he co-owns.

“You know, look, if Tony Hayward wants to put a skimmer on that yacht and bring it down to the Gulf, we’d be happy to have his help,” Burton said to laughter in the White House briefing room.

“But what’s important isn’t what Tony Hayward’s doing in his free time; it’s what BP is doing to take… responsibility for the mess that they’ve made,” he said.

His comments echoed those of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel who called Hawyard’s decision to go to the yacht race “part of a long line of PR gaffes and mistakes.”

But when asked about Obama’s day Saturday, in particular his four hour golf game at a course near Washington, Burton said the president had the right to decompress a bit after a hard week.

“I don’t think that there’s a person in this country that doesn’t think that their president ought to have a little time to clear his mind,” Burton said.

“I think that a little time to himself on Father’s Day weekend probably does us all good as American citizens,” he said.


“Make no mistake: we will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long it takes,” -Obama

Ha Ha! Sure you will………. right after you plug another eighteen holes. Mark Knoller, CBS News Radio White House correspondent reckons Obama has gone golfing 7 times since the oil spill and 39 times since he was selected president by the New World Order. So there are his priorities.

The Obama media is covering for him again. I’ve noticed there are very few pictures of his golfing antics. Mostly they recycle pics from previous outings. So it is very obvious that the propaganda machine is covering for him as best they can. However we know the truth of it. He looks like a spoiled child to me. Nice to know where his priorities are in these troubled times.

Our dear leader fighting the good fight.

A lot of these photos came from a post over at the freerepublic


The ‘non-issue’ everyone is talking about

July 29, 2009
Have you noticed the way the rest of the media discusses the Barack Obama eligibility story?
Everyone from Ann Coulter and Michael Medved and Neal Boortz on the right to Geraldo Rivera and Chris Matthews and CNN’s heretofore unknown president want you to know there’s nothing to talk about here.
But yet they keep on talking about it. And they never really explain why they are talking about it and why it’s not worth talking about – other than the fact that it’s all been researched before and Barack Obama really is a “natural born citizen.”
Now, as one of only a handful of colleagues who has actually investigated this matter – most of whom work for me – I would like to understand from these people how that little matter was settled. Is one of them capable of uttering even one articulate, coherent statement that would help me understand how Obama established his constitutional eligibility for office?
Did he produce an actual long-form birth certificate that would show which doctor delivered him and in whichhospital?
Who are the two U.S. citizen parents to whom he was born – an absolute requirement to be a “natural born citizen” circa 1961?
Why do these media people show so little natural curiosity about the conflicting stories that have been dished out by Hawaiian officials claiming they have inspected the original document and later claiming the original document was destroyed in 2001?
Can any of these people point to any official document from Obama’s past that he has willingly released?
Now, I like Ann Coulter. I consider her a good friend. But when she starts hurling labels like “crank” toward me and my news agency – the only one, by the way, that has thoughtfully, meticulously and thoroughly investigated this matter for 11 months – I take offense.
I expect what I get from the others. When the facts finally come out – and they will – I doubt I will get an apology from any of them except Coulter.
But clearly, this is not a left-right issue. This is not a conservative-liberal issue. This is not a Democrat-Republican issue. This is not an ideological issue. This is a matter of what’s true and what’s not. It’s a matter as simple as whether we take the Constitution seriously and do our best to see that it is honored and observed and defended.
When Ann Coulter suggests this matter was investigated by all the conservative publications, like Human Events, American Spectator and something called the Sweetness & Light Blog, I have to laugh. WND does more investigative reporting in one day than any of these ideologically driven punditry journals do in a year.
Everyone knows who made this story come to life in the last two months and how. WND did it. We did it with solid reporting that has not been refuted by anyone. It has been scoffed at. It has been denigrated. It has been maligned. But the good questions we have raised have not been answered.
I’m gratified that in recent months, Rush Limbaugh has emerged as a media giant who gets it.
I’m gratified that in recent weeks, Lou Dobbs has championed the story.
I’m also gratified that, by any standard you want to measure it – scientific polls, unscientific polls, anecdotal evidence – Americans are becoming more aware of this issue and demanding that Obama come clean.
Can I ask what’s wrong with that?
Why are the rest of the media in apoplectic hysterics over the fact that Americans actually want to see the Constitution honored to the letter of the law?
It hasn’t been yet with regard to Obama’s qualifications. That is simply a fact. It is undeniable. No controlling legal authority has examined this issue – not the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Electoral College, the Federal Elections Commission or any state election officials.
Since when do we as a civil society outsource our constitutional vetting to Snopes.com, a husband-wife rumor-busting team whose research is limited to online searches, and the Annenberg-associated FactCheck.org? Are these unimpeachable sources? Are they incapable of error or being led by their own political biases?
Why is everyone so afraid of asking Obama simply to release his birth certificate – and, for that matter, everything else he is hiding?

Joseph Farah – The ‘non-issue’ everyone is talking about

Posted: July 29, 2009

1:00 am Eastern

© 2009

Have you noticed the way the rest of the media discusses the Barack Obama eligibility story?

Everyone from Ann Coulter and Michael Medved and Neal Boortz on the right to Geraldo Rivera and Chris Matthews and CNN’s heretofore unknown president want you to know there’s nothing to talk about here.

But yet they keep on talking about it. And they never really explain why they are talking about it and why it’s not worth talking about – other than the fact that it’s all been researched before and Barack Obama really is a “natural born citizen.”

Now, as one of only a handful of colleagues who has actually investigated this matter – most of whom work for me – I would like to understand from these people how that little matter was settled. Is one of them capable of uttering even one articulate, coherent statement that would help me understand how Obama established his constitutional eligibility for office?

Did he produce an actual long-form birth certificate that would show which doctor delivered him and in whichhospital?

Who are the two U.S. citizen parents to whom he was born – an absolute requirement to be a “natural born citizen” circa 1961?

Why do these media people show so little natural curiosity about the conflicting stories that have been dished out by Hawaiian officials claiming they have inspected the original document and later claiming the original document was destroyed in 2001?

Can any of these people point to any official document from Obama’s past that he has willingly released?

Now, I like Ann Coulter. I consider her a good friend. But when she starts hurling labels like “crank” toward me and my news agency – the only one, by the way, that has thoughtfully, meticulously and thoroughly investigated this matter for 11 months – I take offense.

I expect what I get from the others. When the facts finally come out – and they will – I doubt I will get an apology from any of them except Coulter.

But clearly, this is not a left-right issue. This is not a conservative-liberal issue. This is not a Democrat-Republican issue. This is not an ideological issue. This is a matter of what’s true and what’s not. It’s a matter as simple as whether we take the Constitution seriously and do our best to see that it is honored and observed and defended.

When Ann Coulter suggests this matter was investigated by all the conservative publications, like Human Events, American Spectator and something called the Sweetness & Light Blog, I have to laugh. WND does more investigative reporting in one day than any of these ideologically driven punditry journals do in a year.

Everyone knows who made this story come to life in the last two months and how. WND did it. We did it with solid reporting that has not been refuted by anyone. It has been scoffed at. It has been denigrated. It has been maligned. But the good questions we have raised have not been answered.

I’m gratified that in recent months, Rush Limbaugh has emerged as a media giant who gets it.

I’m gratified that in recent weeks, Lou Dobbs has championed the story.

I’m also gratified that, by any standard you want to measure it – scientific polls, unscientific polls, anecdotal evidence – Americans are becoming more aware of this issue and demanding that Obama come clean.

Can I ask what’s wrong with that?

Why are the rest of the media in apoplectic hysterics over the fact that Americans actually want to see the Constitution honored to the letter of the law?

It hasn’t been yet with regard to Obama’s qualifications. That is simply a fact. It is undeniable. No controlling legal authority has examined this issue – not the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Electoral College, the Federal Elections Commission or any state election officials.

Since when do we as a civil society outsource our constitutional vetting to Snopes.com, a husband-wife rumor-busting team whose research is limited to online searches, and the Annenberg-associated FactCheck.org? Are these unimpeachable sources? Are they incapable of error or being led by their own political biases?

Why is everyone so afraid of asking Obama simply to release his birth certificate – and, for that matter, everything else he is hiding?

Here are some more documents Obama has also bin hidin:

“Where is the curiosity among my media colleagues?” Farah asked. “If this were Watergate, would they be calling the story dead because of the 18-and-a-half-minute gap in the recording? This is incredible!”

Obama’s birth certificate is not the only document at issue. WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles,  scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

Now that definitely qualifies Barack Obama as an undocumented president!


Professor Gates and Officer Crowley: racial profiling – it’s a black thing too

July 27, 2009

Ever hear of the story about boy that cried wolf Henry?

henrygates_iskindofadickPeople like Professor Gates keep racial divides alive because they make a good living off it. The reality is that Gates is the one guilty of racial profiling here. He still hates the white police and that is why he was arrested. Even though they were there to protect him and his property. At some point in life we all have to learn not to mouth off to the cops – even when they are wrong. I learned that at age 20 when I got pulled over and found myself spread eagle against my car and frisked for shooting off my mouth. How many white guys have been arrested unjustly? We don’t whine and cry about it. Some of us even learn to keep our mouths shut. But Gates because he is black thinks he can run his mouth like an adolescent when he gets mad and throw a temper tantrum. Many black people go through life looking for a white man to hate. Gates found the wrong one in officer Crowley.

Racial profiling works both ways. The civil rights movement has created a bunch of thin skinned crybabies that go through life looking for the white man that has wronged them. They have created a generation of spoiled bigoted cry babies. By going through life looking for racial issues they create racial problems with their attitude.

Gates own words:

he wrote….”As always, whitey now sits in judgment of me, preparing to cast my fate. It is your decision either to let me blow with the wind as a nonentity or to encourage the development of self…..”

I think Obama still has issues with the Cambridge Police because he got a few parking tickets while he was a student at Harvard and considers that racial profiling too. I guess its easier than paying them. He finally paid the fines when he ran for President. Its the same spoiled immature cry baby mentality as Henry Gates. Issues, issues. By wading into this small local issue Obama reveals he has a prejudice and  personal vendetta against the Cambridge Police Dept and “white” officers and it clouded his judgement. It’s good rhetoric for a “community organizer” trying to keep everyone all riled up but not a president. As our chief law enforcement officer he ought to have better sense and judgement.

Henry Gates got arrested because he is dumb ass with a persecution complex and a chip on his shoulder. He didn’t get arrested because he was black. He got arrested for running his mouth like a juvenile. He should have been cooperating and thanking the officers who were there to protect him and his house. Instead he has a racist temper tantrum and gets arrested for it. Grow up and get over it.

And Obama calls the Cambridge Police stupid and implies they are racist? That’s like the pot calling the kettle black – no pun intended. Who looks stupid now? Stupid is as stupid does. Alright I’ll stop.

Peace out!


Can Obama still be president while he is in prison?

December 2, 2008

That might seem like a trite question but it could become a real possibility for Obama. His so called COLB (certificate of live birth) has been proven a photoshop fraud by two different digital forensic investigators. The first comprehensive report was published on Atlas Shrugged on July 20th.  The second report was published Nov 22nd by Dr. Polarik here. The evidence of tampering with this document is clear; but where are the reporters in the MSM? Their silence is an indictment of their own compromised complicity in the scam.

Obama as well has to be complicit in the fraud. It is a criminal act to defraud the American people and it is punishable by incarceration in a jailhouse. Or is Obama going to claim that because he is black he doesn’t need to go to prison? Public stocks would work fine for me. It is ironic that the same people that accused Bush of being a criminal have elected a criminal in his place. In fact his very election was criminal and fraudulent. So who really stole the election? Let the court proceedings begin.

 

OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Imaging guru: ‘Certification’ of birth time, location is fake
‘It would be hard to perform as president from behind jail cell door at Leavenworth’


Posted: December 01, 2008
10:20 pm Eastern    

By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

 

A guru on the “Certification of Live Birth” Barack Obama’s campaign posted online to rebut charges he is ineligible to be president due to the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” requirement says it’s a fake, and further, that such fraud is criminal.

The Obama campaign has told WND such allegations are “garbage,” but Dr. Ron Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in instructional media specializing in computer technology such as printers, scanners and digital imaging, disagrees. His analyses have been posted online in a YouTube video, which also is embedded here:

He explained to WND his four months of research on the images, including nearly 1,000 test images using actual scans and photographs of real certifcates, reveal there are several “giveaways” on the image itself. For example, the document has gray and white between the lettering, not green pixels as the rest of the background document, suggesting someone cut-and-pasted or typed new information that was embedded on top of the background.

Where’s the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. and thus a “natural born American” as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution? If you still want to see it, sign WND’s petition demanding the release of his birth certificate.

Also, Polarik said although the Obama form has a border and seal from 2008, it purportedly was obtained in 2007. He said the seal does not match seals on other documents from 2007, but does match those from 2008. His full report is posted atPolarik.blogtownhall.com.

In Polarik’s view, there has to be a significant reason for a political candidate and campaign to go to such lengths.

“Obviously, there’s something very critical to hide, or they wouldn’t have spent the million dollars in legal fees to prevent the release of his original birth certificate,” Polarik told WND.

“There’s absolutely something to hide,” he said. “If he was born in Hawaii they would have had a luau that would be continuing today.

“Not that the people who voted for him would care,” he said, “but they used this forged document to convince the American voters.

“It’s a scary thought to have someone who essentially begins his presidency as a criminal,” he said, because the use of a faked document as identification is, in fact, a crime, he noted.

“It would be hard to perform as president from behind jail cell door at Leavenworth,” he said.

The video has Polarik’s face and voice disguised and he confirmed in talking with WND that he’s using an assumed name because of the threats he’s reported receiving.

Polarik said the issue of the birth location is a “chink” in Obama’s armor, but the Democrat also has declined to release information about his college years, about his selective service and about his passports, including on what nation’s passport he traveled to Pakistan two decades ago when it was illegal to go there as a U.S. citizen.

Polarik describes his findings and conclusions on the video.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82503

 

 

 


Obama zombies aren’t too bright – but they got hope!

November 20, 2008

“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” – Plato 


nopeThis is a perfect example of the kind of dumbed downed ignorant media manipulated people that voted for Obama. It’s nice to know that the serious issues that will determine the fate of our nation are being decided by idiots like this. It was interesting to see that they could repeat all the propaganda repeated over and over by the media. These are the type of people most susceptible to Obama’s hidden hypnosis techniques.

 

http://www.HowObamaGotElected.com/

“Promote then as an object of primary importance, Institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened.”

George Washington, Farewell Address, September 19, 1796

 

On November 4th, 2008 millions of Americans were shocked that a man of Barack Obama’s limited experience, extreme liberal positions and radical political alliances could be elected President of the United States. For many of these Americans, the explanation was rather simple… the news media, completely enamored with Obama, simply refused to do their job.

On Election day twelve Obama voters were interviewed extensively right after they voted to learn how the news media impacted their knowledge of what occurred during the campaign. These voters were chosen for their apparent intelligence/verbal abilities and willingness to express their opinions to a large audience. The rather shocking video below seeks to provide some insight into which information broke through the news media clutter and which did not.


Free Trade Robber Baron Warren Buffett suffers too

November 19, 2008

Well I’m not sure how much he is really suffering but he is losing money, and that is good news. The Bailout mooch extraordinaire thought he could get a free ride off a taxpayer financed bonanza. Buffett made his billions by exporting America’s premier furniture manufacturing industry to China. Good for you Warren, thats the American spirit. In the wake of his billions he left families, cites, counties and states jobless and desolate. The economic rape America for profit is what I call it. Well he is good buddies with the “chosen one”, man of the people, friend of the working man blah, blah, blah, Oblama.

I remember Buffett well when he went on the toxic assets stump scam with Hank Paulson. He said he wished he could get in on that deal himself. What a load of crap. Buffett could have bought any amount of those toxic assets he wanted at any time. What Buffett did get was the insider trading info that allowed him to invest 5 billion in Goldman and an equal amount in GE. Both which stood to gain from the new untrustworthy Paulson bailout fund. No conflict of interest there though. Buffett even revealed that Paulson called him to ask what he thought about the Freddie/Fannie bailout??? That is illegal insider information. Apparently it doesn’t matter when your Warren Buffett. His bank Wells Fargo also used their share of the bailout loot to rescue Wachovia from the clutches of chop shop junkie Citigroup. Nice use of taxpayer investment funds Warren. Did you know that beforehand and perhaps that is really why you were lobbying for the bailout to pass?

So I’m glad your losing money Warren. Your a lying American jackass. I hope you go bankrupt. I hope your future is desolate. There are some more Obamonics lessons for you in the near future.

Buffett’s Berkshire Falls Most in at Least 23 Years (Update2)
By Hugh Son and Linda Shen

Nov. 19 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett‘s Berkshire Hathaway Inc.fell the most in at least 23 years, dropping for the eighth straight day since reporting a 77 percent decline in third- quarter profit.

The stock plunged $11,550, or 12 percent, to $84,000 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading and has slipped 41 percent this year, compared with the 45 percent drop in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. Berkshire, based in Omaha, Nebraska, rose in 17 of the past 20 years.

“There’s nothing fundamentally wrong with Berkshire, what’s really happening is people are wondering if there’s something fundamentally wrong with the economy, and Berkshire is in some ways a bit of a proxy for that,” said Michael Yoshikami, president of YCMNet Advisors in Walnut Creek, California, which manages $850 million including Berkshire shares.

Berkshire has posted four straight profit declines, the worst streak in at least 13 years, on falling returns at insurance businesses and investment losses. Buffett, ranked by Forbes magazine as the richest American, has committed at least $28 billion this year to acquire companies, finance buyouts and purchase securities as prices fell and competitors were hobbled by limited access to credit.

Berkshire’s shareholder equity, a measure of assets minus liabilities, fell by about $9 billion in October on declines in debt and equity markets, the firm said Nov. 7. American Express Co., the credit-card company that is one of Berkshire’s top 10 stock holdings, plunged 47 percent since Sept. 30 as borrower defaults increased. Wells Fargo & Co., Berkshire’s No. 2 investment, dropped about 35 percent.

`Under Pressure’

“Many of the companies Berkshire owns, such as American Express, are under pressure,” Yoshikami said. “What you’re seeing is a systematic de-leveraging process taking all financials down, including good-quality financials.”