Obama’s ‘New’ Birth Certificate has layers?

April 27, 2011

I haven’t written anything about this dirtbag for a while. To be frank he makes me sick. I get even sicker thinking about how many people still get fooled by him. Here is I think, perhaps the best example of what a liar he is. This new long form birth certificate is suppose to answer the questions about his birth. The main problem is that it appears to be a complete fraud. Why? Because it has layers. If you open the PDF document in Adobe Illustrator you will find that it has 10 layers or groups. The only reason these are there is because the document was created. There is no way these can be created by accident. The only reason to have layers is to compose a document from parts or different elements.

I was not the first to discover this. I saw a link on Drudge and somebody on YouTube had already posted a video showing the layers. It means it is a complete fraud. It means it was constructed by people trying to make us think it is a real long form. Somebody forgot to flatten the image before they made the PDF. It is a fundamental error. Flattening the image removes the layers. There are quite a few other problems with the new long form – but this is all you need to know. It is another fraud and Obama is lying once again.

I have loaded screen shots of the different layers so you can see how the document was constructed. The first two layers appear to be empty. After that there are 8 different elements that were used to construct the document. It quite easy to see how and why they were used. Different fonts and type. His mother’s (was she even his mother?) signature was composed and edited to fit on the document. One line of type seems to have been altered just to make it not look so perfect – like it was really typed on a typewriter.

There are only two ways to get an document into a digital format. Either it has to be scanned or you have to take a digital photo. A scan is better as you get a file that is an exact replicate of the original. Taking photos you have lighting and perspective issues. There is no reason to import it into Illustrator. If I had scanned this I would import it into Photoshop, do any needed color corrections and export it as s PDF. End of story. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO NEED TO IMPORT THIS INTO ILLUSTRATOR. Unless your cutting and pasting and creating a document digitally. But that is fraudulent or normal for Obama.

The following screen shots show the different layers. If you look on the right where the layers are you can see a small eye. When that is turned off the layer is turned off and you can see information disappear from the document. The first three are just showing how to expand the layers palette.

I’m waiting to see if the White House changes the document. They may try to flatten it and replace it. Since the PDF is downloaded from the .gov website there is no way somebody else could do these alterations or edits. The only way is for someone in Obama’s administration. It would be possible for someone to intentionally do this. A saboteur in the Obama Administration. Maybe a CIA agent that got tired of lying for Obama. I’m just guessing that if someone on the inside wanted to expose Obama – this is how you would do it.


Obama Kenyan birth certificate forgery theories debunked

August 5, 2009

Since the Kenyan birth certificate surfaced last week the Obots have launched another coordinated propaganda attack on the authenticity of this document. They are claiming the Orly Taitz has been punked. That this is just another forgery and that the “birthers” are really just stupid. First of all the anti-birthers should know that we are not stupid. We are all fully aware that they are using every means available in the media to try and “punk” us. We have seen a number of disinformation campaigns that are designed solely to discredit us. They hope to gloat and say, “See, your just a bunch of right wingnuts. Your dummies for believing this about Obama. Your just a bunch of racists. Your theory is baseless so give it up.” This is their only recourse, because they really can’t argue the clear fact that Obama has not provided any verifiable documentation that he was born in Hawaii. There is a great deal of testimony and documentation that he was in fact born in Kenya.

The media has accommodated the anti-birthers by repeating their lies and propaganda. Obviously they have not been successful in killing this story or the mounting controversy surrounding it. Seeing Fox News come out against the “birthers” only confirms my suspicion that Fox is just another part of New World Order propaganda. Conservative propaganda designed to keep conservatives off base and controlled. Fox News has showed it’s true colors by being intellectually dishonest and going along with the rest of the Obama media. O’Reilly, Coulter, Glenn Beck and Malkin have all joined with the liberal Obama media. They are controlled by the CFR just like the rest of the media. Rupert Murdoch is a corporate member of the CFR. All I can say is they must be getting worried. Maybe they are scared of the thought of Biden becoming president.

This certified copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate was generated in 1964 long before there was any birth certificate controversy. It was needed by Stanley Ann Obama to get her divorce in 1964. It is not his original birth certificate. It is a copy saying that there is one. It is signed and verifiable. Now the Obots have claim this is a forgery based on four separate points. I have also seen claims that the font was not in use which is incorrect as well reminding me of the Dan Rather forgery episode. These by the way, are just claims made on the Internet. They are not made by independent document experts. They are in fact propaganda design to place doubt in peoples minds about the authenticity of this document.

The four basic charges are as follows:

  1. Kenya did not become a Republic until 1964 after the date the document was generated.
  2. The document # is 44 0 77 showing Obama is the 44th president at the age of 47.
  3. It is signed by E. F. Lavender a brand of soap in Kenya.
  4. The providence should be Zanzibar at the time.

The accusations of forgery are based on these charges alone so lets take a good look at each of them. Dr. Orly Taitz as published on American Grand Jury responded as follows:

Recently Obama’s thugs in main stream media came up with this Bomford report in order to stop my efforts in exposing and prosecuting Obama. Though typically I don’t have time to waste on each and every dumb obot, since it got to National TV and my children”s friends called my children, I’ll spend a few minutes to debunk the obots:
1. Kenya became an independant country in 1963, not 1964. The seal of Kenya was correct.
2. More then one person had certified copies of this document.
3. The document was not issued at birth, but rather was a certified copy obatained in1964, when Kenya became independent.
4. The documents from that time would not show Zanzibar, but rather Kenya.
5. Bomford report was created to try to discredit my efforts.
6. Lastly, I am not supposed to waste my time and money on this issue, Obama is the one who is supposed to provide evidence of legitimacy.
7. [this] Kenyan BC provides more info than the piece of garbage Obama posted on the net, which doesn’t have the name of the hospital, name of the doctor or signatures.
8. Chioumi Fukino and Obama and all their Nazi Brown Shirts in the main stream media need to give it a rest and provide an original hospital BC and the corresponding big thick hospital Birthing file from the Kapiolani hospital. If they don’t have such a file, all of them need to resign immediately or they will be prosecuted for massive fraud and treason to this Nation. (in case you didn’t know, treason carries punishment of life in prison or the death penalty).

An even more complete rebuttal of these claims was published at American Grand Jury:

Oops! It looks like the Obots got caught with their pants down on this one.

Rule number one: This is the internet baby! We save things as soon as we download them. Making comparisons is easy if you know where to look.

Forgery number one: “47,O44″ The Obots were laughing when then they joked: 47 years old, Big O, and 44th president.

Wrong: Orly’s document actually says 47,644. I have it shown here as “negative image” so you can see the original document (you have to look close) does say 47,644 and NOT 47,O44.

The next slight of hand from the forgers says “E.F. Lavender” is a brand of soap in Kenya. Wrong again. The Registrar’s name is K. F. Lavender.

And finally the BIG hoopla about the Australian Birth Registration from Bomford being the REAL deal and Orly’s being the fake. A double wammy on this one. The Bomford document was proven within hours of to be a real amatuer waste of photoshopping skills. The biggest tell-tale on this blooper was the signature in the bottom right corner. It is pretty hard to put the “print” on top of the signature in real life.

By the way, the so-called Patriots yesterday that couldn’t wait to spew their venum by saying “Orly is busted” are surprisingly quiet today. I wonder how that happened.. Sam?

While I am still skeptical and I look forward to a complete examination by the court as it looks very real. The conclusion that I come too is that is a real document and Obama and his lying hacks are going to have a real hard time explaining this one away……

WND also listed some questions about the authenticity of the document:

Among the criticisms, and the responses linked on the Taitz site:

  • Criticism: Document is dated Feb. 14, 1964 and includes “Republic of Kenya,” even though that designation wasn’t official until months later. Response: It would be common for a state after recently declaring it’s independence to act independently rather than continue under the old rule.
  • Criticism: The number 44-O-47 is coincidental as President Obama is the 44th president, and was 47 years old. Response: The number is 44,047, with a “zero,” not an “O.”
  • Criticism: The name E.F. (Earth Friendly) Lavender is a soap. Response: Also the name of a plant. Lavendar also is a SURNAME!
  • Criticism: Coast General Hospital actually is Coast Provincial General Hospital. Response: People abbreviate. It’s not proof of anything.
  • Criticism: Obama’s father, born in 1936, would have been 24 or 25, not 26. Response: Obama Sr.’s actual birthdate isn’t known.
  • Criticism: Would a nation with a large number of Muslims say “Christian” name? Response: Wikipedia reports, “The term Christian name is often used as a general synonym for given name.”

A big key to getting to document either validated or debunked is getting the government of Kenya to cooperate in verifying it’s authenticity. So who’s in charge of Kenya? That would be Odinga. Obama’s let’s have a riot so I get get installed into power even though I lost the election buddy. Well he was the one that arrested and deported Corsi for sniffing around there trying to find out about Obama. So he is Obama’s guy and it is unlikely to get any cooperation from them at all. It is even conceivable that they would lie to prevent any disclosure of the truth about Obama. It leads me to believe this is why Obama broke federal laws in campaigning and getting Odinga elected. Just so he could help cover up the truth about his real birth place. Now that is Machiavellian.


Has Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate finally surfaced?

August 2, 2009

“Oh what a tangled web we weave, when at first we practice to deceive.” -Shakespeare

A copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate finally surfaces. It appears to real and to have been validated. 

It is still possible it is just another phony baloney propaganda attempt to discredit “the birthers.”

If it is real, this would be conclusive prove that Obama has been lying all along.

This would also prove that “the birthers” are not a bunch of cranks and nuts.

This would prove that the “anti-birthers” are the real cranks and nuts.

This would also prove that the media is just propaganda for Obama and the New World Order. That includes Fox.

if it is true it would also prove that Obama is illegally occupying the office of President! 

That would be one big political mess – a real tangled web.

WND post showing his Kenyan birth certificate.


Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report

July 31, 2009

This a very comprehensive report on Obama’s birth certificate and the questions surrounding it. It is something that birth certificate hacks like Ann Coulter and Geraldo Rivera ought to read before they go on Fox News and start shooting off their mouths revealing their own ignorance on the subject. It clarifies why he won’t release his original long form and it also shows that moves are being made by Hawaiian legislators (most likely sympathetic to Obama) to once and for all destroy Obama’s original birth certificate.

The author, an investigator commissioned by a former CIA officer, is rather apologetic for the media’s behavior and the fact that they bought all the lies and propaganda. I am not so sympathetic as it is their job to investigate and understand all the legal questions pertaining to not only Constitutional law but Hawaiian law as well. It is their job to see through propaganda and political lies. In that they have failed completely. Perhaps Jon Klein of CNN, in referring to Obama’s original birth certificate having been destroyed was referencing a plan than that had not been executed yet. Perhaps his only error was that he revealed a plan that was in the works and not yet completed. Maybe they have already destroyed it and are trying to change the laws to cover themselves afterward? Obviously this infers that powerful people are working hard to hide the secrets in Obama’s real birth certificate. They may have put a lot more work into this than we at first thought. That would in fact make it a conspiracy on the Presidents part to deceive the American people. It is not Obama’s fault where he was born. It is his fault if he lies about it so he can be president and bypass the constitutional requirements. I’m guessing a lot of state and federal laws have been broken here to hide the truth.

This was posted at The Western Center for Journalism. WND also wrote a good article covering the post as well.

Sections 57-8, 9, 18, 19, 20 & 40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act explain why Barack Obama has refused to release the original vault birth certificate.  If the original certificate were the standard BC1 type of birth certificate, he would have allowed its release and brought the controversy to a quick end.   But if the original certificate is of the other kinds, then Obama would have a very good reason not to release the vault birth certificate.  For if he did, then the tape recording of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother asserting that she was present at his birth in Kenya becomes far more important.  As does the Kenyan ambassador’s assertion that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, as well as the sealing of all government and hospital records relevant to Obama by the Kenyan government.  And the fact that though there are many witnesses to Ann Dunham’s presence on Oahu from Sept 1960 to Feb 1961, there are no witnesses to her being on Oahu from March 1961 to August 1962 when she returned from Seattle and the University of Washington. No Hawaiian physicians, nurses, or midwives have come forward with any recollection of Barack Obama’s birth.

The fact that Obama refuses to release the vault birth certificate that would instantly clear up this matter almost certainly indicates that the vault birth certificate is probably a BC2 or possibly a BC3.

It is almost certainly a BC 3 or even a BC 4  if the “Certification of Live Birth” posted on the Daily Kos blog and the fightthesmears.com website by the Obama campaign is a forgery.  Ron Polarik has made what several experts claim to be a cogent case that it is a forgery.  There have been a couple of attempts to refute his argument and Polarik has replied to the most extensive of them.  I do not claim expertise in this area, but I think it would be best for journalists and politicians to familiarize themselves with the arguments on both sides before they casually dismiss Polarik’s position without taking the trouble to understand it.

Here are 2 of Polarik’s websites: http://bogusbirthcertificate.blogspot.com/

http://bogusbithcertificate.blogspot.com/

Because the disputants know far more about this subject than I do, I am an agnostic about Polarik’s argument.  However, the likelihood that this computer-generated “Certification of Live Birth” was forged, is, I believe, increased by the fact that it has been pretty clearly established that Obama “either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently.  The documents indicate that it’s one or the other.”  http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/004431print.html The forgery of Obama’s selective service registration was necessary, because according to Federal law, “A man must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service. This applies only to men born after December 31, 1959.” http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/wars/a/draft2.htm)

These are just a few nuggets pertaining to the birth certificate. It is a long article and covers every aspect of Obama’s birth mysteries. It is a long read but well worth it for anyone who wants to understand all the legal complications of Obama’s mysterious birth certificate or lack thereof. The former CIA officer that commissioned the investigation wishes to remain anonymous. That is understandable when you read how the witness to the break in at the State Department passport records,Lt. Quarles Harris Jr, who was cooperating with the investigation ended up dead.


The ‘non-issue’ everyone is talking about

July 29, 2009
Have you noticed the way the rest of the media discusses the Barack Obama eligibility story?
Everyone from Ann Coulter and Michael Medved and Neal Boortz on the right to Geraldo Rivera and Chris Matthews and CNN’s heretofore unknown president want you to know there’s nothing to talk about here.
But yet they keep on talking about it. And they never really explain why they are talking about it and why it’s not worth talking about – other than the fact that it’s all been researched before and Barack Obama really is a “natural born citizen.”
Now, as one of only a handful of colleagues who has actually investigated this matter – most of whom work for me – I would like to understand from these people how that little matter was settled. Is one of them capable of uttering even one articulate, coherent statement that would help me understand how Obama established his constitutional eligibility for office?
Did he produce an actual long-form birth certificate that would show which doctor delivered him and in whichhospital?
Who are the two U.S. citizen parents to whom he was born – an absolute requirement to be a “natural born citizen” circa 1961?
Why do these media people show so little natural curiosity about the conflicting stories that have been dished out by Hawaiian officials claiming they have inspected the original document and later claiming the original document was destroyed in 2001?
Can any of these people point to any official document from Obama’s past that he has willingly released?
Now, I like Ann Coulter. I consider her a good friend. But when she starts hurling labels like “crank” toward me and my news agency – the only one, by the way, that has thoughtfully, meticulously and thoroughly investigated this matter for 11 months – I take offense.
I expect what I get from the others. When the facts finally come out – and they will – I doubt I will get an apology from any of them except Coulter.
But clearly, this is not a left-right issue. This is not a conservative-liberal issue. This is not a Democrat-Republican issue. This is not an ideological issue. This is a matter of what’s true and what’s not. It’s a matter as simple as whether we take the Constitution seriously and do our best to see that it is honored and observed and defended.
When Ann Coulter suggests this matter was investigated by all the conservative publications, like Human Events, American Spectator and something called the Sweetness & Light Blog, I have to laugh. WND does more investigative reporting in one day than any of these ideologically driven punditry journals do in a year.
Everyone knows who made this story come to life in the last two months and how. WND did it. We did it with solid reporting that has not been refuted by anyone. It has been scoffed at. It has been denigrated. It has been maligned. But the good questions we have raised have not been answered.
I’m gratified that in recent months, Rush Limbaugh has emerged as a media giant who gets it.
I’m gratified that in recent weeks, Lou Dobbs has championed the story.
I’m also gratified that, by any standard you want to measure it – scientific polls, unscientific polls, anecdotal evidence – Americans are becoming more aware of this issue and demanding that Obama come clean.
Can I ask what’s wrong with that?
Why are the rest of the media in apoplectic hysterics over the fact that Americans actually want to see the Constitution honored to the letter of the law?
It hasn’t been yet with regard to Obama’s qualifications. That is simply a fact. It is undeniable. No controlling legal authority has examined this issue – not the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Electoral College, the Federal Elections Commission or any state election officials.
Since when do we as a civil society outsource our constitutional vetting to Snopes.com, a husband-wife rumor-busting team whose research is limited to online searches, and the Annenberg-associated FactCheck.org? Are these unimpeachable sources? Are they incapable of error or being led by their own political biases?
Why is everyone so afraid of asking Obama simply to release his birth certificate – and, for that matter, everything else he is hiding?

Joseph Farah – The ‘non-issue’ everyone is talking about

Posted: July 29, 2009

1:00 am Eastern

© 2009

Have you noticed the way the rest of the media discusses the Barack Obama eligibility story?

Everyone from Ann Coulter and Michael Medved and Neal Boortz on the right to Geraldo Rivera and Chris Matthews and CNN’s heretofore unknown president want you to know there’s nothing to talk about here.

But yet they keep on talking about it. And they never really explain why they are talking about it and why it’s not worth talking about – other than the fact that it’s all been researched before and Barack Obama really is a “natural born citizen.”

Now, as one of only a handful of colleagues who has actually investigated this matter – most of whom work for me – I would like to understand from these people how that little matter was settled. Is one of them capable of uttering even one articulate, coherent statement that would help me understand how Obama established his constitutional eligibility for office?

Did he produce an actual long-form birth certificate that would show which doctor delivered him and in whichhospital?

Who are the two U.S. citizen parents to whom he was born – an absolute requirement to be a “natural born citizen” circa 1961?

Why do these media people show so little natural curiosity about the conflicting stories that have been dished out by Hawaiian officials claiming they have inspected the original document and later claiming the original document was destroyed in 2001?

Can any of these people point to any official document from Obama’s past that he has willingly released?

Now, I like Ann Coulter. I consider her a good friend. But when she starts hurling labels like “crank” toward me and my news agency – the only one, by the way, that has thoughtfully, meticulously and thoroughly investigated this matter for 11 months – I take offense.

I expect what I get from the others. When the facts finally come out – and they will – I doubt I will get an apology from any of them except Coulter.

But clearly, this is not a left-right issue. This is not a conservative-liberal issue. This is not a Democrat-Republican issue. This is not an ideological issue. This is a matter of what’s true and what’s not. It’s a matter as simple as whether we take the Constitution seriously and do our best to see that it is honored and observed and defended.

When Ann Coulter suggests this matter was investigated by all the conservative publications, like Human Events, American Spectator and something called the Sweetness & Light Blog, I have to laugh. WND does more investigative reporting in one day than any of these ideologically driven punditry journals do in a year.

Everyone knows who made this story come to life in the last two months and how. WND did it. We did it with solid reporting that has not been refuted by anyone. It has been scoffed at. It has been denigrated. It has been maligned. But the good questions we have raised have not been answered.

I’m gratified that in recent months, Rush Limbaugh has emerged as a media giant who gets it.

I’m gratified that in recent weeks, Lou Dobbs has championed the story.

I’m also gratified that, by any standard you want to measure it – scientific polls, unscientific polls, anecdotal evidence – Americans are becoming more aware of this issue and demanding that Obama come clean.

Can I ask what’s wrong with that?

Why are the rest of the media in apoplectic hysterics over the fact that Americans actually want to see the Constitution honored to the letter of the law?

It hasn’t been yet with regard to Obama’s qualifications. That is simply a fact. It is undeniable. No controlling legal authority has examined this issue – not the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Electoral College, the Federal Elections Commission or any state election officials.

Since when do we as a civil society outsource our constitutional vetting to Snopes.com, a husband-wife rumor-busting team whose research is limited to online searches, and the Annenberg-associated FactCheck.org? Are these unimpeachable sources? Are they incapable of error or being led by their own political biases?

Why is everyone so afraid of asking Obama simply to release his birth certificate – and, for that matter, everything else he is hiding?

Here are some more documents Obama has also bin hidin:

“Where is the curiosity among my media colleagues?” Farah asked. “If this were Watergate, would they be calling the story dead because of the 18-and-a-half-minute gap in the recording? This is incredible!”

Obama’s birth certificate is not the only document at issue. WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles,  scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

Now that definitely qualifies Barack Obama as an undocumented president!


Coulter sides with CNN in Obama’s birth certificate propaganda war

July 27, 2009

OK…. what’s the matter with this picture? Ann Coulter sides with the CFR propaganda of CNN. Bizarre behaviour really. They really must be getting desperate to have her come out on their side. Is she now an expert on birth certificates? It would appear from her trite comments that she really knows nothing about it. People are starting to ask questions and I think the NWO is getting nervous. Coulter tries to claim that there are just a “few cranks out there” but there are many more than just a few  – and we are not cranks! She lies just like a liberal on CNN. A recent AOL poll cited 82% want to see the real birth certificate. Thats a whole lot of “cranks.” America is finally wising up to the fact that the “certification of live birth” in question posted on factcheck.obama does not answer the questions about his birth. It is the “certificate of live birth” that would answer our questions. He has already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees to prevent us from seeing it. Very Clintonesque. What are you hiding Obama?

Now most media nitwits including Ann Coulter are not aware of the critical difference between the two forms. Or perhaps they are but still continue to try to use the two interchangeably because they are intentionally trying to deceive us. The birth certificate posted on fraudcheck, even if it is real, does not prove he was born in Hawaii. It only proves he wants us to think he was born in Hawaii.

Media titans Rush Limbaugh and Lou Dobbs have both weighed in on the issue recently so obviously the story is not dead. CNN has been trying to run a new spin since Dobbs “came out” asking for some real verification. At first they had his understudy Kitty Pilgrim trying to shoot down the story and undermine Lou Dobbs. Then Jon Klein comes up with a story that CNN investigated it and found out Hawaiian officials no longer have the much sought after document because it was “lost” during the conversion to digital files in 2001. Another magic bullet to save face? Stay tuned for tomorrows headline: “CNN’s Keystone Cops Investigate Missing Birth Certificate.”

The Obama campaign brought out the digital “certification of live birth” during the campaign. Since then different experts in digital forensics confirm that this is in fact a photoshop fake. Who made the fake birth certificate and posted it online. What was their motive? The MSM has never even addressed these charges. When the questions won’t still go away they trot out a couple of state officials who claim they have seen the birth certificate. First of all, this is just heresay evidence as no one can even verify that they even looked at it. Even if they did look at it, that doesn’t prove anything. What were they looking at? Maybe it a fake too. What exactly are their credentials for examining it? Are they experts? Can they tell if its a forgery too? Now CNN comes out with this new story about lost records and they hope to finally make this a “dead story.”

In reality they are only creating more questions which WND has covered very well. If the birth certificate posted online put this issue to rest why do you need State officials to verify it? It the State officials answered all questions why is CNN even investigating a story that according to Klein is dead? And how can they look at something if it doesn’t exist anymore? Already WND is reporting that Hawaii officials contradict Klein’s claim that original records were destroyed. So much for those CNN investigators getting to the bottom of Obama’s birth certificate controversy. The reality is all they are doing is creating another layer of propaganda and even more questions.

Directly contradicting CNN chief Jon Klein – who ordered host Lou Dobbs to quit discussing President Obama’s birth certificate – the Hawaii Department of Health affirmed that no paper birth certificates were destroyed when the department moved to electronic record-keeping.
“I am not aware of any birth certificate records that have been destroyed by the department,” Janice Okubo, public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, told WND. “When the department went electronic in 2001, vital records, whether in paper form or any other form, [were] maintained. We don’t destroy records.”
Okubo affirmed that beginning in 2001, all vital records, including birth records, moved to electronic formats.
“Any records that we had in paper or any other form before 2001 are still in file within the department,” she insisted. “We have not destroyed any vital statistics records that we have.”

Now Hawaii State officials have tried once again to verify that Obama is a natural born US citizen. How could they do that if the original records don’t exist anymore. Oh, wait they do exist now. So was Jon Klein of CNN lying for Obama? Just making up stuff to protect the “chosen one?” Who were these CNN investigators anyway? Obviously they weren’t working for Lou Dobbs. It seems that they just can’t get the story straight. Of coarse Obama could just produce his real birth certificate and put an end to the whole controvery. But since it appears he was born in Kenya that will be very difficult for him to do. So what exactly are these records that the state has that verifies his birth in Hawaii? Perhaps they are still trying to recreate a forgery that will pass for the real thing. Has Ann Coulter or any other person that considers themselves able to comment on this looked into any or all of these questions? The only way that Ann Coulter could side with CNN on this is that she in fact is controlled by the same CFR propaganda influences that dominate both CNN and Fox News.

There also exists a recorded tape and video of Obama’s maternal grandmother saying he was born in Kenya. She said she was in the hospital when he was born. Has anybody in the media tried to interview her to verify this? Kenya under the rule of Odinga who Obama helped install has locked down the entire family to prevent any contact with the media and when Jerome Corsi went to Kenya he was arrested and deported for trying to investigate the story. Did Obama install Odinga just so he could prevent any investigation in Kenya? Now that is a conspiracy theory worth looking into.

The role of Fox News in the CFR controlled media today

I have suspected that Fox News plays the role of controlling conservatives by setting the agenda of what they will discuss. The end effect is that “conservatives” are led astray by Republicans pretending to be “conservatives.” They have tried to create an orthodoxy of conservative values that politicians pay lip service to. Anyone outside this fake orthodoxy is ridiculed as a “nut” or “conspiracy theorist.” Commentators like Coulter and many others play the role of dividing the republic along biased liberal and conservative lines. It creates an endless conflict which CFR politicians exploit for political purposes.

Apparently Fox News will not discuss or really investigate Obama’s birth certificate either. So they are they same as CNN. They a part of the CFR propaganda machine. They do not have Rupert Murdoch’s approval to really investigate. Murdoch is a corporate member of the CFR. Coulter, Hannity or O’Reilly will never discuss or investigate the CFR, the Trilaterals, the FED, the Bilderbergers or the New World Order. Most conservatives are still completely deceived by this aspect of the New World Order propaganda. They are there to control conservative, not destroy them. They want to keep them manageable. As the body of the horse is controlled by the bridle so do they control and steer conservatives. They were completely led astray with Bush as he systematically destroyed America pretending to be a “conservative.” Fox was at the forefront of the Bush Ra Ra club.

Ann Coulter is a CFR conservative. Another member of the elite pretending to be conservative. Her goal is to keep Republicans hating liberals. She is not interested in the truth or the constitutionality of Obama’s selection by the New World Order. All she wants to do is use it to keep Republicans hating liberals. They employed her mouth here because she influences the way a lot of conservatives think and since they are comprise a lot of the “cranks” that are out there they think she can head them off at the pass. What they failed to grasp is that she is losing a lot of credibility by weighing in against the very people that usually look to her for leadership. Having Obama in there right now screwing up the country is in her interest. That way she can blame the Democrats for all the errors of Bush. Partisan politics takes priority over national interest again. Can you imagine why any Republican in their right mind would not pursue this issue? McCain produced a birth certificate for a judge. You would think Coulter would demand the same thing for Obama. Why would she protect him?

Lou Dobbs, a so called liberal, does a far better of of reporting on the real issues that threaten America than anyone at Fox News including Coulter. It is a wonder that he is able to keep his job at CNN. I think that is why he has moved to a radio show as well. To protect himself in case they manage to get rid of him. I talk to many conservative that will not listen to him because they are so preoccupied with hating CNN. Ironic isn’t it. His News show is more in sync with their view of the world than Fox.

It is very revealing I think that liberals see right through Fox propaganda but don’t see the liberal version at CNN. Conservatives see right through liberal propaganda at CNN but don’t see it at Fox News. A recent study of partisan behaviour in politics by Emory University called Westen: Partisan brains can keep politics, facts separate, reveals the partisan nature of the mind and how it shuts down reasoning facilities in favour of “their” side winning. It is a fascinating study and I believe it explains the partisan phenomena I have just described.

Obviously in spite of the best efforts of the propaganda masters of CNN and Faux News – this story is not dead! The “birthers” are alive and well and this story will not go away. We want the truth and we deserve the truth. Instead of investigating the facts all the conservative propaganda meisters like Coulter at Fox can do is ridicule those of us that are not brain dead enough to be spoon fed their propaganda. There are serious questions here and they have not been answered yet. Coulter will have to come up with something more substantial than superficial elitist ridicule of the “birthers” to resolve the real issues of Obama’s lack of documentation. The most important issue of Obama’s birth certificate story is that the CFR controlled media are protecting him and assisting in his deception.

Ann Coulter: “Obama Birthers” are wrong


Obama Signs Executive Order Barring Release Of His Birth Certificate

July 23, 2009

I wonder what Obama is hiding here?  Mmmmmmm?

From Four Winds:

On January 21st, 2009, his very first day in office, Barack Obama implemented and signed into law Executive Order 13489.
For those of you who can’t take the time to read it. here is the section that applies:
“Sec.2
Notice Of Intent To Disclose Presidential Records
When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines providied by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.”
Now for all of you who commented on our previous articles that we were no more that right-wing nut jobs, that this thing about Obama’s birth certificate was a non-issue, and those of you who tried to shift the focus of the stories, doesn’t this strike you as just a little odd?
That the first order of business Obama took care of on day one of his Presidency was to sign off on an Executive Order that states that only the records he chooses to be made public will be released?
This is the subject that was at the absolute top of his agenda?
If this isn’t proof that Obama is hiding something, I don’t know what is.
www.infowars.com/obama-signs-executive-order-barring-release-of-his-birth-certificate/

obama_certificate