This a very comprehensive report on Obama’s birth certificate and the questions surrounding it. It is something that birth certificate hacks like Ann Coulter and Geraldo Rivera ought to read before they go on Fox News and start shooting off their mouths revealing their own ignorance on the subject. It clarifies why he won’t release his original long form and it also shows that moves are being made by Hawaiian legislators (most likely sympathetic to Obama) to once and for all destroy Obama’s original birth certificate.
The author, an investigator commissioned by a former CIA officer, is rather apologetic for the media’s behavior and the fact that they bought all the lies and propaganda. I am not so sympathetic as it is their job to investigate and understand all the legal questions pertaining to not only Constitutional law but Hawaiian law as well. It is their job to see through propaganda and political lies. In that they have failed completely. Perhaps Jon Klein of CNN, in referring to Obama’s original birth certificate having been destroyed was referencing a plan than that had not been executed yet. Perhaps his only error was that he revealed a plan that was in the works and not yet completed. Maybe they have already destroyed it and are trying to change the laws to cover themselves afterward? Obviously this infers that powerful people are working hard to hide the secrets in Obama’s real birth certificate. They may have put a lot more work into this than we at first thought. That would in fact make it a conspiracy on the Presidents part to deceive the American people. It is not Obama’s fault where he was born. It is his fault if he lies about it so he can be president and bypass the constitutional requirements. I’m guessing a lot of state and federal laws have been broken here to hide the truth.
Sections 57-8, 9, 18, 19, 20 & 40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act explain why Barack Obama has refused to release the original vault birth certificate. If the original certificate were the standard BC1 type of birth certificate, he would have allowed its release and brought the controversy to a quick end. But if the original certificate is of the other kinds, then Obama would have a very good reason not to release the vault birth certificate. For if he did, then the tape recording of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother asserting that she was present at his birth in Kenya becomes far more important. As does the Kenyan ambassador’s assertion that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, as well as the sealing of all government and hospital records relevant to Obama by the Kenyan government. And the fact that though there are many witnesses to Ann Dunham’s presence on Oahu from Sept 1960 to Feb 1961, there are no witnesses to her being on Oahu from March 1961 to August 1962 when she returned from Seattle and the University of Washington. No Hawaiian physicians, nurses, or midwives have come forward with any recollection of Barack Obama’s birth.
The fact that Obama refuses to release the vault birth certificate that would instantly clear up this matter almost certainly indicates that the vault birth certificate is probably a BC2 or possibly a BC3.
It is almost certainly a BC 3 or even a BC 4 if the “Certification of Live Birth” posted on the Daily Kos blog and the fightthesmears.com website by the Obama campaign is a forgery. Ron Polarik has made what several experts claim to be a cogent case that it is a forgery. There have been a couple of attempts to refute his argument and Polarik has replied to the most extensive of them. I do not claim expertise in this area, but I think it would be best for journalists and politicians to familiarize themselves with the arguments on both sides before they casually dismiss Polarik’s position without taking the trouble to understand it.
Here are 2 of Polarik’s websites: http://bogusbirthcertificate.blogspot.com/
Because the disputants know far more about this subject than I do, I am an agnostic about Polarik’s argument. However, the likelihood that this computer-generated “Certification of Live Birth” was forged, is, I believe, increased by the fact that it has been pretty clearly established that Obama “either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently. The documents indicate that it’s one or the other.” http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/004431print.html The forgery of Obama’s selective service registration was necessary, because according to Federal law, “A man must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service. This applies only to men born after December 31, 1959.” http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/wars/a/draft2.htm)
These are just a few nuggets pertaining to the birth certificate. It is a long article and covers every aspect of Obama’s birth mysteries. It is a long read but well worth it for anyone who wants to understand all the legal complications of Obama’s mysterious birth certificate or lack thereof. The former CIA officer that commissioned the investigation wishes to remain anonymous. That is understandable when you read how the witness to the break in at the State Department passport records,Lt. Quarles Harris Jr, who was cooperating with the investigation ended up dead.